2_2_3a_7yr

Mourning Squidoo

The day before yesterday I was banned from Hubpages. That day was about shock.

Yesterday I archived my stuff and wrote about Hubpages as it exists in our world now.

Today I find myself mourning the Squidoo that was. Not the Squidoo that gave up last year, but the Squidoo that was fun, and fresh and where I learned writing, online networking and SEO.

Not that Squidoo taught any of those things. In hindsight it is clear that Squidoo was successful not so much because its owners knew what they were doing, though to an extent they did. No, it was mostly successful because they started at a good moment in webtime.

In 2010, when they did their big redesign with monsters, I started collecting images from the site. This post shares some of them, as well as images from all over the web – charting the Squidoo that was.

The homepage

This is how they drew me in. Everyone is an expert on something!

squidoo-expert

Some more screenshots of the homepage:

This must be pretty early: its still the old logo and a white background. However, the images as teasers look pretty modern.
This must be pretty early: its still the old logo and a white background. However, the images as teasers look pretty modern.
The Squidoo home page in 2010. All that text!
The Squidoo home page in 2010. All that text! and remember the Answer Deck?

This must be just after that when they invented the monster-badges (also in 2010):

squidoo-home-20xx

In the end (2014) this was the banner they used. You can see, it’s a totally different look. The Squid is gone:

670px-Make-a-Squidoo-Lens-Step-1

Janet’s profile in 2009:

squidoo-profile-2009-janet21

How profiles looked around 2010. They didn’t change much after that.

squidoo-monsters-profile-2010-sept

My dashboard in 2010:

squidoo-monsters-dashboard-2010-sept

We had a lot of fun at the forums:

squidu-squidoo-forum

Some of the banners:

banner_gifting-2010

This one feels particularly cynical in hindsight: banner_hqbanner-holiday-giftsgoodveg-banner-okt-2012

Monsters and Trophies

The first strophies were really the Giant Squid and Citizen Squid Badges.

100club

However, what they turned into in 2010 was quite a shock. Suddenly Squidoo was officially a game with monsters.

squidoo-monster-banner-sept-2010

I think this is where I started to tune out a bit. I turned off the monster activity popups for instance. But not before taking a screenshot:

squidoo-monsters-activity-popup-comment-2010-sept

However, don’t think I turned down a ‘turboboost’. Lensrank was money after all:

squidoo-monsters-activity-quests-turboboosts-2010-sept

Lots of people had fun with Halloween. It was also a good money spinner. Here are my Halloween trophies:

halloween-trophies-squidoo-2011-2012

In 2010 they used the forums to get us to give us ideas for new lenses. I took part in the Jenga Quest:

jenga-quest-2010-2011

We got to know the activity stream. Another distraction.

squidoo-monsters-activity-stream-2010-sept

In 2010 they wanted us to create lenses and turn people into lensmasters so bad, they had us ‘gift’ them. I don’t think it ever caught on much. I like how this screenshot includes some of the templates available back then.

create-a-gift-lens-dec-2010

 

I really liked the debate option of Hey Monkeybrain.

btn_hey

heymonkeybrain_400

Squidoo lenses

I can hardly find screenshots of Squidoo lenses themselves. It seems hardly anybody posted screenshots of them online. However, I did find this one from 2008:

squidoo-lens-2008

Here’s one I created for one of my help lenses. You’ll have to ignore the lines I added:

new-intro-2

Yes – however quant it may look. Lenses did used to look like this. Note the advert for creating a ‘Squidcast’. We could tell our fans (yes, we had official fanclubs) all about our stuff back then. Again, how disappointed we were when that feature disappeared.

result-new-introd

Squidflix was apparently quite popular: I found several screenshots online:

squidflix

 

The old Squidwho design
The old Squidwho design
I did a lot of quizzes. In part because the SquidQuiz homepage practically guaranteed a decent internal backlink.
I did a lot of quizzes, mainly because the SquidQuiz homepage practically guaranteed a decent internal backlink.

Gift lenses circa 2010:

squidoo-gifts-guide

We used to get stars for our lenses. In fact, it was quite an uproar when they were replaced with thumbs up:

stars2

Here’s a 2009 screenshot of a very popular lens:

Color-Meaning-squidoo-lens

 

Here’s one from Greekgeek – a reasonably late screenshot with one of the themes:

squidoo-lens

Blueprint-squidoo-theme

goodveg-lens
This is a screenshot done by a very spammy website I’m therefore not linking to.

 

There were some weird ad-experiments:

This is from 2013. It didnt last.
This is from 2013. It didn’t last.

What we’d love to forget, the scorecard.

670px-Make-a-Squidoo-Lens-Step-3

Modules we loved

The various plexo’s were great while they lasted. Here’s an amazon plexo:

Squidoo-amazon-plexo

Didn’t we love the bubble module?

oldtalk-buble-squidoo-up-to-2010 newtalk-bubble-squidoo-starting-2010

Somehow that seems like a fitting sentiment to close with.

Sources for my images

Schermafdruk 2015-04-01 10.07.54

What I learned from being banned by hubpages

I was flabbergasted last night: it turns out my account was banned. I’ve calmed down a bit. I’ve saved my content and stats and am moving forward. Here are a few take-away’s. The main one is obvious: don’t trust Hubpages!

  • Set your Hubpage earnings to go directly through amazon/ebay/adsense. That way if they shut you down, you’ll at least get paid what you earned on the site. In other words: don’t sign up for the internal hubpage ad program. I’m missing out on about $300. See below for a short how-to.

NOTE: I just got an email from hubpages. It says:

I just checked your account and see that it was banned, so you will be issued a payment for the unpaid balance on or around May 28th.

  • Hubpages will NOT tell you when you’re banned. It won’t even have an announcement at the backend of your account. Here is what will happen:
    • Dead give away: your profile will say you’re banned, if you click on it. [Yes, it feels a bit like a mystery where you have to find clues about what is going on. Hubpages is certainly not up front about this stuff.]
    • You won’t be able to post in the forums.
    • Your hubs will all turn red in the backend. However, they will stay there. It looks like they’re staying there for a long time.
    • All accounts associated with your paypal (or adsense) account will be banned at the same time. [It’s a TOS violation to be active on hubpages once you’ve been banned on one account, so any other accounts are automatically in violation once one account is banned.]
    • About adsense: the hubpage backend will tell you: ‘Association Disabled by HubPages for past violations’. Don’t worry, Google doesn’t care.
  • Hubberscore nor hubscore will save you. My spirituality account has a hubberscore of 79 as I write this. Still – banned.
  • Quality won’t save you – not even hubs edited through their own HubPro program.
  • Traffic won’t save you either. One of my accounts was doing very well (the green icons show that these are hubpro-hubs:

traffic-hubs

  • This is a gigantic clean up: I had all sorts of stuff in my account that I would no longer put online. The web has changed. On Squidoo I did a lot of experimenting: throw stuff at the wall and see what sticks. In republishing material from Squidoo/Hubpages I will only repost what fits my main niches or was reasonably successful.
  • Evernote is a life-saver. I’m using its webclipper to archive all my hubs.
  • Google Drive is useful too: I’m using it to archive my hubpage stats.

So how do you set up your earnings settings to op OUT of the hubpages adprogram?

The order of these steps matter. Nothing works in hubpages till you’re signed up for adsense.

  1. Click on the ‘earnings’ tab.
  2. Configure adsense (if you haven’t already)
  3. Make sure you opt OUT of the Ad program.
  4. Under Amazon use the link at the bottom to enter your own amazon affiliate ID.

amazon-program

Conclusion

Perhaps most importantly: Hubpages is in a bind. They can’t just accept any content, because that means that Google will see the site as low quality. However, they also have to keep their writers happy. The sort of content I wrote, and bought, and practiced my writing on… it’s the sort of thing anybody would write. Nothing special, but also not spammy.

I’m not sure a middle ground exists where authors can trust that their content will stay up and make a bit of money, but where Hubpages also avoids low quality content coming into the site or staying there.

In other words: if you have a niche you’re most interested in, do invest in your own website.

Post Script (added April 3rd 2015)

I asked why I was banned. This was the response:

Your HubPages account has been permanently banned as a result of serious rules violations.

I did have all kinds of former hubs that were flagged for Violations. This is the email I received to one of those. I bolded what I had in fact done on many of my hubs, linking them through to other hubs I still think that’s good SEO as long as the hub in question has enough original content of its own.

Hi religions7,

As you are part of the HubPages community, we want you to succeed, so we want to let you know that your Hub has been unpublished because it is Overly Promotional. If this is the first time you’ve gotten an email like this, don’t worry! You’ll have an opportunity to fix it.

Overly Promotional means that one or more of the following is true about your Hub. It:
*Solely or excessively promotes another site, product, or service
*Over-uses words or phrases that disrupt the Hub’s readability, which may include repeated emphasis of phrases with bold or italics
*Links more than 2 times to a single domain
*Gives a short teaser and a link to “read more” or “continue”
*Links to a page that contains largely the same content as your Hub
*Has excessive Amazon or eBay capsules

When you are finished editing your Hub so that it complies with our Terms of Use, please click the “Submit for Publication” button. We will then review your Hub and publish it if it is no longer in violation.

Please note that repeated violations will result in the banning of your account. We encourage you to familiarize yourself with our Terms of Use and our Learning Center before publishing again:

http://hubpages.com/help/user_agreement
http://hubpages.com/learningcenter/publishing-standards#txtd_22732854

All my accounts & all my hubs unpublished! @hubpages

I was going to post this on the forums but it turns out that I’m not allowed anymore. So here is to all former squids – so you know what hubpages is turning into.

Over the past few days ALL my hubs on three of my accounts have been unpublished. Without explanation. While some of them may have been outside the current hubpage-guidelines, others were improved by the HubPro program.

I’m not even sure my pending earnings will be paid out.

I’m flabbergasted.

To be clear – although I had been cleaning out my accounts of content that was already unpublished or unfeatured for traffic or ‘quality’ topics like the following were still on my main (formerly spirituality) account:

  • Best ethics movies, ready for debate?
  • How to prevent ear infection in adults
  • Little known facts about The Netherlands
  • Vegetarian Health Tips
  • Severn Suzuki – a famous environmental video: where is she now?
  • What is an Ashram? Spiritual Retreat Centres!
  • Quiz: Religion facts and trivia
  • Karma and Reincarnation: are we reborn?

How to use Thesis Multimedia Box in Thesis 2.*

I have been using Thesis to design my sites for years now. I love the flexibility of Thesis 2, and have now compared it to Genesis as well – and Genesis just doesn’t do what I want it to.

However, there is one thing in Thesis 1 that I wasn’t able to replicate on my newer Thesis installs: the multimedia box. I have used it, on several sites, to show affiliate code in the sidebar. In the new Thesis this option is hidden.

So here is how to get that affiliate code there, customized per post.

First: make sure to show ‘custom fields’ in your WordPress (post) edit screen. Go to screen-options and then click ‘custom fields':screen-options-wp custom-fields-options

Now in your post edit screen, somewhere at the bottom, you will have an option to add custom fields. It will show a dropdown with available custom fields: that is, custom fields that plugins or theme have already created for you. In the case of Thesis there are several. (#) You will need:

  •  thesis_custom_code – this is your Thesis multimedia box.

That’s great: you now have the place where you can add custom code to individual WordPress posts. However, it won’t show up yet. The easiest way I have found to add that code to your theme is through widgets, specifically, the Advanced Custom Field Widget plugin by Athena of Delphi (yes, a woman coder :))

What do you do next?

  • Install the plugin (duh)
  • Go to appearance > widgets
  • Add the ‘Adv. Custom Field’ widget where you want your field to show up in your theme.
  • Put the name of your field in the settings for the widget. In our case that name is: ‘thesis_custom_code’ (without the quotes). You need to be precise. One letter wrong, and nothing will happen. (*) That is: your field still won’t show up on the published site. It will remain in the WordPress database though.

acfw_ver0_9_controlpanel4-500px

NB: this is a widget with a LOT of options. All you need however is the first field in the widget: where I put in the thesis_custom_code field name in red for clarity (it will of course show up in black on your own site). That’s all. Scroll down to the bottom of the widget settings to the blue save button and click it.

That’s it. Now previously created content for the thesis multimedia box will show up in your theme where you want it to go. In addition, you can add new content or change the content in the multimedia box through the custom field.

 

(#) You will see that the Thesis post image is also available here.

(*) WordPress allows for creating your own fields. You will still have to make sure that the name you use in the widget is the same one you use when creating a field through the WordPress post interface. I won’t show how to do that here.

How to move a hub?

Someone asked:

So question for you all, when you move your hubs, where do you move them to and do you need to ask for the hub to be unpublished? I’m so confused, I have just let my sqhbs sit there……..

Since this seems a common question these days – or at least each of the subquestions is common – I will attempt an answer.

0) (implicit) Which hubs should you move?

Hubs that are unfeatured will not be found by Google. This means they’re dead in the water. If you think they’re high quality, move them. This is the main reason to move hubs.

featured

Featured‘ means Hubpages is showing your hub to search engines.

Unfeatured‘ means Hubpages is hiding your hub from search engines.

Unfeatured for engagement‘ means that Hubpages has determined that your hub is decent quality, but it’s not performing well enough. This may be fixed by getting traffic, sales, people commenting in the guestbook or adding a poll. Personally I don’t bother. If Hubpages unfeatures a hub, it will simply get moved at some point. Unless of course I think it isn’t good enough.

Unfeatured for quality‘ means that Hubpages has determined that your hub is low quality. Remember: you don’t have to agree. Hubpages uses both automated and manual criteria. In other words: chances are no human saw your hub when it was decided it was low quality.

Another reason to move hubs is very simple: if you have a site that ranks in Google, any hubs within that niche can be moved there. For featured hubs that get traffic, I would probably wait till after Christmas. However, after that they are safer on your own site than on Hubpages. After all: you know what you’re doing with your own site and if Google agrees that your site has merit, there is really no reason to keep content in that niche on any site but your own.

Personally I am moving all my spiritual content, all content that I think is at all interesting and all content that I think will do better elsewhere. However, the place to start (and I’m still working on this part) is hubs that aren’t featured.

1) Where to you move your hubs?

I move most of my content to my own niche sites. In some cases it’s easy: the site gets good Google traffic and the new content will probably rank there.

It gets more tricky when you have niche sites that don’t rank – the new content may help Google to reevaluate that site. That is: more quality content will make Google take the site more seriously, which will in turn help all content on that site rank.

If you don’t have a niche site to move your content to, there are several options:

  1. Leave it where it is. This is only reasonable if you don’t think the content is very good, or if it’s featured on Hubpages and doing as well as you think it likely to.
  2. Move to a new personal blog. Even blogger might do. Create a niche site, or even just a general purpose blog. Blogger will not unfeature your content – though Google may still not be interested.
  3. Move to another article site. The pickings are getting slim, but Wizzley is still up and running. I notice that most of my high traffic articles on wizzley get more traffic from Bing and Yahoo, not Google. But hey – they’re featured and they’re getting traffic. That is still a lot better than hidden from search engines.

2) How do you move your hubs

Now we come to the nitty gritty. And yes, this is a several step process.

a) Make sure the content is really no longer visible in search engines AND not indexed in Google.

1) Find the url of the published hub. Save it in a text-file or something.

2) Then click on the ‘unpublish now’ button in the edit-screen for that hub.
Schermafdruk 2014-12-05 13.57.46

3) Go to Google Webmaster tools Removals. Copy paste the URL of the original hub there and follow instructions.

Voila: the hub is no longer visible to search engines AND you’re sure that Google will de-index it within the next 24 hours.

Note that step 2 is unnecessary if the hub is already unfeatured.

b) Move them somewhere appropriate

 

Linking myths – post Panda and Penguin

Google has been making life harder for those of us who make a living online. With sites closing left and right – because Google stopped giving them traffic – authors are getting a big paranoid about what linking practices are ‘allowed’ and/or considered ‘spammy’.

I can’t really blame people: common sense just isn’t enough anymore. However, some things floating around the online forums are just plain nonsensical.

So here are some questions I have been asked recently, and my answers. Continue reading Linking myths – post Panda and Penguin

Squidoo is dead, Long Live Hubpages

squidoo-trophiesOn August 15th, Seth Godin announced that the website I have long been making a living on, Squidoo, is going. The content and it’s authors are moving to Hubpages (and therefore the money making opportunities as well). It was a stressful day, so I had to process information quickly. I decided within half an hour that I liked this news. While I once loved Squidoo, I had come to distrust its management. Hubpages was always slightly annoying, and boring, but it is run by competent people. The kind who actually know how to build a site.

Was it really that bad at Squidoo? Yes, it really was.

I’ve been silent on Squidoo’s many mistakes in public, over the last year, because I was still making money there and it was becoming clear HQ wasn’t listening to feedback anyhow. The only thing I did was advise people to stay out of Squidoo if they weren’t already in.

Now that the take-over is official, I can finally open my pen. This is mainly about the stuff that happened after the panda update that penalized Squidoo late 2012, early 2013. Continue reading Squidoo is dead, Long Live Hubpages

Google+ help: circles vs communities

Google+ is the upcoming social network according to industry stats. Google+ shares are directly correlated to high search rankings. This may mean that shares actually help stuff rank (which I doubt) or it can mean that stuff which ranks, tends to be shared (which seems likely). For that reason I think it’s time to revisit Google+ and see how it fits into my online strategy.

Over the years I’ve occasionally been active there and the result is that I have over 1000 people following me right now. Pretty amazing for a network I haven’t been active in. There are two ways to share posts with specific groups within Google+. The first is ‘circles’ the second ‘communities’. For a newby the two can be confusing. Here’s a quick summary I gave on the topic on facebook:

The circles are the way in which we can organize public shares – the google+ communities are like facebook groups: people can join them and they can be private or public or whatever. Circles are your private way of organizing that feed, so you can actually find the posts by your friends among the link-drops you’d rather not see. I have a ‘noisy’ circle for instance, for people I know, but whose posts I don’t need to see, because there are just too many of them.

So, if you want a share to only go to your friends who like baseball, you create a ‘baseball’ circle. If you want to FIND people to discuss baseball with and ask them a question or discuss the latest game, you join a baseball community. Communities on Google+ can be really fun. They’re a place where real discussion takes place. You can join communities around all your interests and find interesting people there. You can also decide whether or not you want the discussions in those groups to show up on your general Google+ feed. In most cases I’ve chosen not to have them there, because there are just too many things going to my Google+ feed anyhow.

However, it’s up to you. Google+ is a bit weird. On the one hand everybody who has a Google profile (Gmail users for instance) automatically has a Google+ account. So many users aren’t actually users. They just have an account because Google forced them to create one. The service is also a bit complicated.

However, it does solve some of the issues that are cropping up on facebook. One is privacy – Google+ circles make it very clear to whom your post is visible and you get to make that choice with everything you share. So some things can be public, others will only go to the people you have in circles (aka follow) and some will go to specific groups of people.

For general usage the main issue with Google+ is likely to be that it just has too many options. However, since the use of Google+ is apparently on the rise, perhaps people are learning to deal with that. Or they are finding simplified ways of using it that don’t use many of the customization options the system has.

In terms of privacy management Google+ is definitely a step up from Facebook: the default is to decide on a post-by-post basis what goes to which circle. Sure, the system remembers your last setting and uses that as a default, but changing that is not only easy, but a prominent interface option. To share something to a community you have to actually go to that community page. 

Duplicate content on WordPress – hey, Google indexed my tag pages!

On Facebook I’ve recently seen people ask about duplicate content on WordPress blogs. People are panicking. It’s logical to panic, unfortunately, because Google has been acting strangely lately. However, no-indexing ALL your tag and category pages is a mistake. You do want normal links between pages of your site. You do want Google to FIND your older posts. 

So here’s my recipe:

  1. Pick one way of categorizing your posts that’s most important: tags or categories. 
  2. Make sure this one is visible to users and search engines. In 9 cases out of 10 you do NOT need both.
    Having categories (usually your best pick) visible to search engines means that not only are all your posts visible to Google – as it crawls the category pages – you have the added advantage of on topic pages your users may particularly like. And – as a bonus – if you have a theme like Thesis you can add unique content on top of these category pages (explaining the category, for instance) to make these pages more attractive to search engines. 
  3. No-index and Follow the date based archives (never useful) and the tags/category system you’re not using. In many cases you also want the Author archives to be invisible to search engines. The easiest way to do this is using Yoast’s SEO plugin
    You do want to ‘Follow’ all links, btw, because that way when someone links to one of these pages, at least the pages it links to will get seen. 
  4. Have one big sitemap for your whole blog. Like this 
    That way you’re sure all your posts and pages are visible for Google and have top access to whatever pagerank your homepage has. Unfortunately I use a custom version of an old plugin that’s no longer being developed on this blog, so I can’t help you actually DO this. On some blogs I simply go with Simple Yearly Archive
  5. Use some plugin to interlink related posts. Right now I prefer nrelate.
    This is another way to make sure Google knows what your site is about and get individual posts to rank. 

Now here’s my explanation

I understand worrying, as I said. However, that doesn’t mean we have to avoid the most basic common sense approaches to website  building and WordPress blogging. Google has given us some very clear guidelines about how they want us to build websites. Here are a few:

Build for visitors first. Show visitors and search engines the same thing.

This means that if you have useful categories and tags, do show them to your users and do show them to search engines as well. If in doubt: make them MORE useful. (See the bonus with point 2 above). 

Links are the fabric on which the web is built.

The only links you have legitimate control over these days are the links WITHIN your website. Hiding tags and categories from search engines means that you’re saying to Google: don’t trust my site. In effect you’ll be linking from your homepage ONLY to the pages/posts visible on your homepage. That means only your last 10 posts and whatever posts and pages you have listed in your menu. The rest will be INVISIBLE to Google. NOT a good idea. 

So how about duplicate content?

Let GOOGLE worry about that. Seriously. Yes, the snippets from your posts will show up on your category and tag pages. As long as your posts are generally longer than that, the original post is still likely to be seen and indexed by Google. After all, the category and tag pages LINK to that original post. 

So how about duplicate content?

Still worried about that? Well, with tag pages there is some reason to worry. If you have posts about gadgets and they’re all tagged both ‘gadget’ and ‘electronics’ the tag pages for ‘gadget’ and ‘electronics’ are going to be pretty much the same. Assuming Google sees that – and was going to rank one or the other TAG PAGE for something – it would be a problem for them to be identical. You’re splitting pagerank between the two TAG PAGES which makes it less likely either is going to be seen by search engine users. This is a problem with your tagging. Most people tag very inexpertly anyhow (which is part of why I recommend most people to use categories instead) and yes, if you tag like that, you probably need to hide your tag pages from Google. 

So I should really NOT hide all my tags/ categories etc. from Google?

Really. You should at least have EITHER your tags OR your Categories visible to Google. Google can figure it out. Most (genuine) blogs online don’t worry about this stuff. Out of ignorance. A few are still getting bucketloads of traffic from Google or wherever. And yes, we do have Matt Cutts’ word on this. He notes that 25% of the web is duplicate content. And that’s normal. More from Matt on this issue: rel=canonical and duplicate content won’t hurt you, unless it’s spammy.

Post Script: what about the date archives?

Well, I did say in a byline above that you should hide them from Google and Users. Honestly, I forgot about them. The first thing I do when setting up any WordPress site is deleting the date-based-archive widget. Unless your blog is purely personal, I don’t think organizing by date is EVER as useful to readers as by organizing by topic. I mean, who – except perhaps my mom – would be interested to know what I wrote in August 2013? You’re interested to know what I wrote about Squidoo, or WordPress or SEO recently. If you have any readers at all, they’re interested in your topic. Even the New York Times organizes by topic first, date later. And WordPress is organized by date by default anyhow, you don’t need specific date-based archives. So hide them from users and search engines. And that means no-index / follow. 

Squidoo vs Hubpages vs Wizzley vs Zujava summer 2013

[edit] Autumn 2014: this article is thoroughly outdated. Squidoo has closed shop. Zujava has been banned from the amazon affiliate program and Wizzley is apparently incapable of fixing (or getting rid of) a broken link-checker. Hubpages is the only quality platform in town today. Unfortunately, it is experiencing a Google slap, so even that option is not too good. I recommend sticking to your own sites in any niche where you have sufficient content. Google is rewarding small quality sites right now. [/edit]

Panda and Penguin are thoroughly messing with the Web 2.0 online marketing / online making a living business. The result for Squidoo is that has a lot less traffic than this time last year.

Hubpages was caught earlier and seems to be recovering decently. Wizzley and Zujava were started when Google was already making it clear that it was going to come down hard on low quality content, so they have more stringent guidelines built in than either of the others originally did. In other words: they have less legacy low quality content to deal with.

The reason for this post is that @jasoncox1983 asked me on twitter:

So what do you think is better now adays since Googles update Squidoo, Hubpages, or some other web 2.0 platform? Thanks

The fact is – part of me thinks that this whole web 2.0 business is simply being outmaneuvered by Google and the only way out is building your own quality blog and promoting it and hoping it draws traffic. I’m sure that’s what Google wants you to do. Only start monetizing when you have a solid subscriber base AND a few hundred visitors a day.

On the other hand, Penguin and Panda aside, I do still make a living on my online income. That income is made mostly, still, on Squidoo.

Do I recommend Squidoo to newbies? 

Absolutely not! It’s been user-unfriendly to non-giants for at least a year now. Over the past month, even giant squids (lensmasters who have at least 25 quality pages on the site) have been banned, seen their lenses locked without warning etc. Two of my lenses were locked, in fact. One was probably a bug. The other deserved the lock, has been improved, and is waiting review.

In other words: your content simply isn’t safe on Squidoo. You can always take it off, of course, but the fact is that currently the site treats it’s writers very badly.

What’s a lock? A locked lens is invisible to both Google and visitors.

Do I recommend Hubpages to newbies? 

Well, that’s a different story. While Squidoo’s filters are unpredictable, and you can have your hub locked (aka: invisible to both readers and Google) without warning, Hubpages only hides them from Google. Also, their instructions on what is ‘wrong’ with your page are clear and if you follow through, will result in your hub being visible to both Google and visitors again.

Hubpages still has more hoops to jump through than I’d like, but I can definitely cautiously recommend them.

Do I recommend Wizzley and Zujava

I’m putting these two in one boat as they started around the same time and have similar advantages and disadvantages. My personal preference is Zujava, just like my personal preference between Hubpages and Squidoo was always Squidoo. That’s a personal taste thing though – I don’t have hard data to back that up. Also – look what happened to my Squidoo preference…

Wizzley and Zujava both have very clear content filters (for now): just make sure your content isn’t copied from somewhere else on the web and make sure you have enough words.

If you started out today, where would you start? 

If I started out today I would probably take that job as a software tester I turned down and limit my online writing to the stuff I REALLY care about (aka spirituality).

The way things are today, I’m very glad I put off buying a house and getting a mortgage.

Here are my original tweets to Jason:

@kh7spiritual 
@jasoncox1983 Squidoo – crazy to publish anything new there. Hubpages – seems stable at least. zujava and wizzley – decent options.

@kh7spiritual 
@jasoncox1983 Btw: mostly determined by how these platforms RESPOND to Google updates, not the updates themselves.

@kh7spiritual
@jasoncox1983 Basis of web 2.0 marketing is still, and more than ever: quality content. DO NOT over-use keywords. Do use plenty of words.

@kh7spiritual 
@jasoncox1983 The kind of words a real human would appreciate, relevant to the topic.

Note that in this post I’m only recommending (well, sort of) sites that I’ve used. All the links here are affiliate links. Depending on the platform I may earn something if you sign up through one of those links, or if you visit the site and click on ads there.